There are a few techniques that you can use to ensure your literature search has been comprehensive. Check out these techniques in the tabs below.
Backward citation search (also known as pearling) refers to searching for papers cited in the references section of an original paper. Forward citation search (also known as snowballing) refers to searching for papers that have cited an original paper.
Both these citation searches allow you find relevant papers easily.
There are online tools which can also help you with backward or forward citation search:
Handsearching is a manual process used to supplement traditional database searching and ensures that relevant studies are not overlooked. It also increases the comprehensiveness of your research.
You will need to identify the journals, conferences, trial registries, reference lists of relevant papers and other sources as required and conduct a manual handsearching process.
Not all reports or papers can be found through database searching because:
According to the Cochrane Handbook, handsearching is a 'manual page-by-page examination of the entire contents of a journal issue or conference proceedings to identify all eligible reports of trials'.
Sometimes you need a bit of help to get you going. If you are struggling, these tools can help you to find seed papers or ensure you have not missed out on key articles. They are a good place to start, but keep in mind that they are supplementary to a traditional database search and do not replace the search process.
Chat-based search:
Find more papers based on a seed paper:
Grey literature refers to information sources that are beyond the reach of traditional bibliographic databases. Examples of grey literature include theses and dissertations, conference proceedings, government reports, data and statistics, newsletters, technical reports, standards & clinical guidelines, recommendations, presentations and lecture notes. As grey literature comes from varied sources, it can be typically hard to find.
Grey literature is described as ‘highly desirable’ in the evidence landscape (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2022, see 4.3.5). Grey literature provides a broader perspective on research topics than that provided with only an academic focus. Therefore, it helps reduce publication bias (Paez, 2017) in reviews.
View our Grey Literature Guide for more information about where and how to search for grey literature.
Further reading:
Paez A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of evidence-based medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Research synthesis methods, 5(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1106
Complete the forms below to make an appointment and speak with a librarian.
|
|
© Eastern Health Library Service 2021-2023